Israel and Palestine and Flotillas.. oh my! June 1, 2010
Posted by Excogitate Cake in news, Politics.Tags: deaths, Flotilla, Israel, news, Palestine
add a comment
Unless you’ve been hiding under a blog proof blanket in the last 24hrs you would know that Israeli Armed forces boarded a cruise ship described as the “Freedom Flotilla”. In the course of this boarding action a reported 19 civilians were shot and killed with many more wounded.
Initially the outrage was pure and outrage-tastic with many a headline of “unarmed peace activists slaughtered by elite Israeli commandos”. As more information comes to light it seems that the “peace activists” were armed with metal poles, bottles and slingshots and viciously attacked the Israeli troops as they boarded. The footage coming out of the “peace activists” attacking the soldiers is sickening and very un-peace like…. HOWEVER… if reports of the ship being boarded in international waters are accurate then the Israeli boarding of the ship was illegal and could be roundly described as a gigantic cock-up of the highest magnitude by the Israeli leadership.
What do I think will happen as a result of this gigantic Israeli blunder? Probably nothing. We’ll see a lot of headlines about it in the short term, but just like unrelenting expansion of Israel into Palestine and the conspicuous inaction of the international community this issue will be loudly condemned… but that’s it.
Helping Australia? May 31, 2010
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Geek, news, Politics.Tags: Australian Government, Censorship, Conroy, Filter, RC
add a comment
Well I thought I had better actually use this blog for it’s intended purpose once in a while.. i.e. blogging.
What to talk about? There has been a lot going on in the world recently, horrendous oil spills/leaks, Facebook having it’s way with our private data and Queensland education regressing into the dark ages. I’m sure I’ll get to those juicy topics in the near future, but for now I’d like to talk about a topic which I care passionately about.. Conroys looming Internet Filter.

There are so many reasons why the filter is a bad idea. Unfortunately most of these reasons are only revealed by having either specialized knowledge (techy types) or by people who can look past the face value of the proposed filter and apply some wholesome critical thinking skills. Never-mind the largely uninformed public opinion of the filter, i’m more disturbed by how rarely these simple critical thinking skills are used within the Australian Government.
For the purposes of this article we can ignore the horrendous technical aspects of the filter and just assume that it has a flawless technical component. Breaking the proposed filter down to it’s most simple actions and goals still results in a self refuting failure (which i’ll eviscerate here for good measure).
The filter is (apparently) being introduced to give Australian Internet surfers an RC material free browsing experience. Which is where we run headlong into the main problem.. when has the accidental finding of child pornography or illegal material ever been raised as a problem by anyone? I challenge any supporters of the filter to provide some evidence that an unfiltered Internet has ever posed any problems for an innocent Australian citizen stumbling onto illegal content. It just doesn’t happen.
If you’re not searching for illegal material, you won’t find it.. and if you ARE searching for illegal material then not much is going to stop you from finding it. Senator Conroy has even admitted himself that circumventing the filter is not hard to do and it’s not illegal to do so… how can this massive contradiction not bring the plan to a shuddering halt?
There are so many other mind boggling problems with the filter, but I find this one short and sweet contradiction in the plan the most dumbfounding. Maybe a Government over-site committee could be formed which takes the time to apply these elementary logical tests to Government proposals.
I really wish our Government would do things because they are the right thing to to.. rather than doing it to win the votes of the uninformed masses.
Please support these organizations who are trying their best to inform the uninformed.
Placeb.. uh I mean homeopathy September 10, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Humor, Science.Tags: Funny, Homeopathy, Logic
2 comments
This post comes as a result of a discussion I had with some friends regarding homeopathy. Now these people weren’t really well read on the topic and they didn’t fully appreciate the absurdity of the homeopathic practice but they more or less had a general support for “stuff like that”.The discussion certainly made me aware of the ever pervasive haze of pseudoscientific waffle which the overwhelming majority of people accept and don’t get too fussed by those annoying details of evidence or logic.
Ok, let’s get some things straight. If you’re not familiar with the bat s$^@ craziness of homeopathy this post will probably be a good starting point to break down these supposed “medicines”.
First of all.. What is a homeopathic remedy?
Well the short version is that a substance is diluted in huge quantities of water and the water is meant to retain a memory of the original substance.. thereby having an effect on our bodies.
Now when I say dilution I don’t mean and wussy 1 part per million, or the lazy 1 part per billion or even the wishy washy 1 part ber hundred billion. Oh no no.. that’s FAR too weak a remedy (that’s right.. in homeopathy the LESS dilute the substance is the weaker it is) We’re talking recommended dilutions of 1 part drug/herb/substance to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 parts water.
The base of a homeopathic remedy is first diluted 1 part to 10 parts water. This is shaken around a bit & 1 part is taken from this dilution. The 1 part of diluted substance is then added to another 10 parts water and the shaking around continues. This dilution is called 2X (1 part to 100 water) Each time the substance is diluted to 10 parts water the X number increases by 1. An easy way to look at the numbers is to look at the number preceding the X as the number of zeros of the water dilution. So a 30X dilution would be 1 part drug to 1 with 30 zeros parts water.
It’s interesting at this point to also add that at the point in human history that these homeopathic remedies were invented people didn’t know about atoms or molecules so they had no idea what the smallest part of matter was, or how matter by chemical or physical process interacted.
Now we come up against a concept called Avogadro’s number. This number relates to the number of atoms or molecules in a substance and can be used to extrapolate that at 24X dilution a homeopathic remedy has no reasonable chance that it contains any of the original substance. Now homeopathic remedies are generally at dilutions of 60X.. at which point you would need to give 2 billion doses per second to six billion people for 4 billion years to deliver a single molecule of the original material to any patient.
Now you might this that by this point the homeopathic theory is well and truly the realm of lunacy. But this is where the human ability for excuse making really comes into the fore. The generally accepted theory is that a “memory” of the original substance is retained in the water and that THIS is what has the effect to cure you. In modern times, people wishing to cling to this fantasy are now crediting scientific theories (of which they have no understanding of) like string theory or quantum theory as the explanation for this untestable memory of water.
As you can see the more you delve into the homeopathic theory the more incredibly insane and ludicrously contradictory it gets. Lets continue…
Now that we’ve got the basics down we can delve into the mind boggling contradictions and ludicrous justifications you’ll often hear for Homeopathy (these are the answers I have been given many times during discussions of homeopathy)
Q: If water has a memory, and the more dilute the water is from the original substance the “better” the remedy is… logically shouldn’t all water on the earth no matter what has been done to it have at one point in it’s life been in contact with every good, bad and otherwise substance and therefore have every imaginable homeopathic effect?
A: Actually i’ve never heard an answer for this one.
Q: Also, logically since all water has been at some point in it’s life in contact with every conceivable element, drug, chemical, herb etc.. a person prescribed a homeopathic remedy will be introducing all manner of conflicting “cures” to their body?
A: Again, no reasonable answer has ever been given for this.
Q: Since the logical impossibilities of the homeopathic principle are obvious, I submit that the effect people experience to “cure” them is the well known placebo effect.
A: “Oh but I once gave a homeopathic remedy to my pet which got better who couldnt’ have comprehended the medicine and thus the placebo effect can’t be the explanation”
Flaws in the answer: Now this is what we call “observational bias” where by a person who is looking for a certain effect will see it, or think they see it when it isn’t there. Ever noticed how if you buy a new shirt, you’ll all of a sudden notice other people wearing the same shirt? It’s the same thing.. and this is why double blind scientific studies have been created.
Q: Explain the process by which modern physics, biology and basic logic can’t explain how Homeopathy could EVER work.
A: Well you know how quantum/string theory seems mysterious and seemingly out of the bounds of reach of our knowledge? Well it’s like that, we can’t test that the effect is there, but it is!
Flaws in the answer: Quantum and string theory are very complicated and SEEM mysterious to the layperson however the models these theories are developed on are very specific and rely on testable, logical and consistent evidence. Quantum and string fluctuations DO NOT.. I repeat DO NOT affect matter or the effects of matter on the MACRO level. Also, if you claim that the effects of homeopathy are undetectable by modern science than the positive or negative effects of the medicine must ALSO be undetectable. If our bodies respond to a homeopathic remedy THEN IT IS TESTABLE.
Q: How is it that the fundamental concepts of physics, biology, chemistry and basic logic contradict homeopathy and all tests performed under reasonable scientific conditions fail to provide evidence for homeopathy past the placebo effect.. yet you still believe that it’s a viable medicine?
A: ………
Long story short.. In our society, for concepts such as gods, mysticism, spirituality, conspiracy theories and homeopathy people have (falsely) created special categories of requirements of proof where people will willingly cling to the most absurd conclusions simply because they WANT them to be true.
Isn’t it time we, as a society grew up?
Corinthians 13:11 “When I was a child, I made use of a child’s language, I had a child’s feelings and a child’s thoughts: now that I am a man, I have put away the things of a child.”
The “Truth” Movement August 28, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in news, Science.Tags: Friends, Truth
add a comment
I’ve had the unfortunate discovery that a good friend of mine is heavily involved in and and advocate of “The Truth Movement Australia”. I once respected this friend for being quite an intellectual person, we’ve had plenty of great discussions both in private and with other friends. Since I’ve found out about his passion for the Truth Movement I’ve got serious concerns for his well being both physically and mentally.
The Truth Movement is an organization which in my opinion can be summed up as “A vile anti-intellectualist organization utilizing fear and paranoia to spread it’s harmful rhetoric”. It’s a place where conspiracy theorists and kooks can gather to pat each other on the back about supposed “truths” they have uncovered on “Big-Pharma”, government agendas, or any other plot where a vague and ominous big enemy has a plan to harm the little people.
It’s a sad website to browse through. The opinions expressed there as “truth” have such a staggering level of disconnect with any level of empiricism, evidence, logic or basic foundations of any part of the definition of “truth”. It’s truly horrifying..
Here’s a few great “truths” they support
- Don’t vaccinate your kids, I hear that there is mercury in them, mercury is bad therefore vaccinations are bad
- “Big Pharma” creates diseases for profit
- Various Illuminati conspiracies
- Chemtrails (seriously batty stuff here)
- The new swine flu vaccine is really a plot by the American government / big pharma to murder 100s of millions of American citizens for profit (this was a series of front page news items)
I really don’t know what I should do. Should I try to sit down with this friend and appeal to his intellectual side? Some of the stuff is completely harmless and just a bit of fun conspiracy theories, but the strong anti-vaccination theme is quite concerning and shows a level of fear mongering requiring zero evidence which could have quite a serious implication to any children him & his wife may have in the future.
It’s all too overwhelming, the main argument against it which I can’t get out of my head is “Are you F%&@ing serious? Do you people listen to yourselves?! Do you even KNOW the definition of TRUTH??!”
Link: http://www.truthmovementaustralia.com.au/forum/
Quote time August 12, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Uncategorized.Tags: Humor, Quotes
add a comment
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. – Bertrand Russell
And now for a something a little more lighthearted! August 11, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Uncategorized.add a comment

Why fight the fight? August 11, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Atheism.Tags: Atheism, Introspection, Wife
add a comment
I had an interesting discussion with my wife about my passion for all things Atheist *. She asked the simple question of “why is there the need to struggle against religion?” The discussion was obviously much more obtuse than this question but the underlying theme got me doing some pretty heavy introspection.
Am I some sort of intolerant bastard trying to confront people with a logical breakdown of their beliefs? Why is it “wrong” for people to maintain a private belief which is demonstratibly pure fantasy? Why am I such a “reality” nazi?
Honestly her blunt confrontation of my intolerance of fantasy was hard to receive and harder to dismiss out of hand. It didn’t shake my philosophical stance at all, in that I am still able to classify no evidence, untestable, unfalsifiable, inherently contradictory, and whimsical statements as FALSE. However it did shake my resolve of my need to stick my foot out during day to day conversations and trip up “belief” based statements which would otherwise have come and gone without anyone’s feathers getting ruffled.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t go making scenes in public yelling “How do you figure THAT!!?” at street corner preachers in the city. Lets just say I’ve had some lengthy and confrontational discussions with friends who believe in things like the efficacy of homeopathy, or other fiction based beliefs.
My initial reaction to the question was “But they’re WRONG!” which I regretted saying as soon as the words left my mouth. Who gives a shit if someones effectively private belief is wrong? Our next door neighbors are Jehovah’s Witnesses and they are the friendliest and most wonderful people who would do almost anything for us and I’ve never felt the need to shove a bible under their noses and point out that for them to be Jehovah’s Witnesses they should murder my wife and I for our non-belief.
A later angle of introspection was look at other beliefs which the vast majority of people are openly intolerant of like racism, sexism or Scientology (HA!). It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that racism is a false belief. Sexism is a slightly more complicated issue but most people will be able to express the flaws in the broad belief that one particular sex is “better”. And almost anyone could tell you that they think Scientology is a load of crap, but it requires a fair bit of research to specifically break down WHY it’s a false belief. It’s interesting that I’ve never heard anyone say “oh but you shouldn’t tell someone that racism/sexism/Scientology is false, it’s true for them”. People just know they are a load of hogwash and that our society would be a better place without them.
Somehow religion has garnered itself a mystical shield where by any attack on it is met by a general view of “You can’t say THAT! You’re so mean!”
I mean logically it’s easy to say why a person SHOULD oppose religion, it’s damaging to our society, it’s based on pure bigotry and it’s an utterly corrupt organization. But that still doesn’t give a reasonable justification to smack down an otherwise perfectly nice friends statement as soon as they are “incorrect”.
I was really chewing the cud on this one until I hit upon a rich vein of the very indignation which was leveled at me. How dare I attack peoples personal beliefs simply because I don’t agree with them? How dare THEY assert that MY beliefs are false!! Why should a rational, empirical, testable, falsifiable view of reality always give into fantasy? What gives fantasy the trump over the reality we very literally live and breath? It’s certainly not an answer which gives me free license to be a bastard to my religious friends, but it’s good enough to quash the opposition to the growing “atheist movement” (whatever that may be).
Overall I feel that I’m more conscious of my need to be more polite about my opposition to falsehood, but overall I think the exploration of how to effectively “market” the naturalistic world view is a valuable question for us to ask ourselves.
* FYI I use “Atheist” as a shorthand for “A philosophical stance where the truth value of any statement is evaluated on the accuracy of it’s description of reality”
Words of wisdom July 30, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Uncategorized.Tags: Atheism, Quotes
add a comment
“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.” – Albert Einstein
The uncomfortable questions kids ask July 28, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in Atheism, Humor, news, Science.Tags: Atheism, Humor, news
5 comments
It’s a classic comedy situation where a child asks it’s parents an innocent yet socially awkward biological question resulting in a hasty and heavily censored reply. We’re all thinking that this question usually involves sex, or contraception or alternative lifestyles, well we’ve now got a new one.. and it’s a doozy!
DNA
I shit you not! (edit: actually I DO shit you.. it’s a satire article poking fun at parents uncomfortable about nude statues *cough* the points still stands though)
Parents in Berkley, California have complained about a sculpture of a double helix outside UC Berkeley’s Lawrence Hall of Science representing genetic material from an enzyme. One particularly vocal parent said “It’s vile and offensive, and kids have no business seeing what God thought fit to hide from our eyes.” This particular parent is worried that his little girl will ask him to explain DNA and possibly broach the topic of why there is nothing in the bible about it.
As always these questions are not uncomfortable for the children who have a healthy inquisitive nature. The unease rests solely on the shoulders of the parents who are realizing that their beliefs are so ridiculous that a child can find holes in them.
Link to original article: Evil DNA Sculpture
First Post July 27, 2009
Posted by Excogitate Cake in General.Tags: Atheism, cake, excogitate, Humor, introduction, news
add a comment
Excogitate: To reflect deeply on a subject; thinking something out with care in order to achieve complete understanding of it.
Cake: A rich, sweet dessert food, typically made of flour, sugar and eggs, goes in your cake hole.
To be honest I can’t articulate exactly what you should prepare yourself to see within this blog. My best guess is a haphazard collection of humor, musings, news, ideas and rants (as if the internet doesn’t have enough of those).
My broad interests which I think will appear here often are science and atheism although I’m also a sporadic artist and a keen cook so you’ll no doubt be treated with some of my half finished artistic exploits or successful recipes.
I hope you’ll enjoy what’s to come..